Lockdrop method was designed to be a fair distribution of tokens for all that participated, allowing a large amount of individuals to obtain tokens. Based on the summary stats of the 2nd lockdrop it can be seen that a few accounts locked in access of 1K ethereum which would put those individuals or entities in possession of a large amount of PLM tokens. How decentralized will Plasm when a few accounts hold a large portion of the supply and i’m talking beyond price dumps, in terms of governance or mischievous behavior. You can wonder why an individual would lock 1K eth, pay the opportunity cost to then act maliciously but some people do in fact just have this amount of ethereum at their disposal as a long term hold so they wouldn’t have really paid an opportunity cost to acquire the PLM token by locking their Eth