Core i7

您所在的位置:网站首页 i7-2760 Core i7

Core i7

2024-07-10 13:40| 来源: 网络整理| 查看: 265

Core i7-8850H vs Core i7-2760QM Aggregate performance score Core i7-2760QM20114 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt 2.82 Core i7-8850H20186 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt 6.61 +134% i3-12100F i5-13600K i9-14900KS Ryzen 5 5500 Ryzen 5 7500F Ryzen 7 7800X3D Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

i7-8850H outperforms i7-2760QM by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents Primary details Detailed specifications Compatibility Supported technologies RAM capacity and type Integrated graphics cards Performance benchmarks Gaming capabilities Pros & cons summary Vote for your favorite Similar processor comparisons Community ratings Questions & comments i7-2760QM i7-8850H Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2760QM and Core i7-8850H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1607975Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100Market segmentLaptopLaptopSeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core i7Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)Release date4 September 2011 (12 years ago)2 April 2018 (6 years ago)Launch price (MSRP)$378$395Current price$304 (0.8x MSRP)$1454 (3.7x MSRP) Detailed specifications

Core i7-2760QM and Core i7-8850H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)Threads812Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.6 GHzBoost clock speed3.5 GHz4.3 GHzL1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)L3 cache6 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)Chip lithography32 nm14 nmDie size216 mm2149 mm2Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °CMaximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °CNumber of transistors1,160 millionno data64 bit support++Windows 11 compatibility-+Unlocked multiplierNoNo Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2760QM and Core i7-8850H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11SocketFCBGA1224,FCPGA988FCBGA1440Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt45 Watt Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2760QM and Core i7-8850H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2AES-NI++FMA+no dataAVX++vPro++Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++Speed Shiftno data+My WiFi++Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0Hyper-Threading Technology++TSXno data+Idle States++Thermal Monitoring++Flex Memory Access++SIPPno data+Demand Based Switching-no dataFDI+no dataFast Memory Access+no dataStatusDiscontinuedLaunched Security technologies

Core i7-2760QM and Core i7-8850H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++EDB++Secure Keyno data+MPXno data+Identity Protection++SGXno dataYes with Intel® MEOS Guardno data+Anti-Theft+no data Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2760QM and Core i7-8850H are enumerated here.

AMD-V++VT-d++VT-x++EPT++ Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2760QM and Core i7-8850H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600DDR4Maximum memory size32 GB64 GBMax memory channels22Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s42.671 GB/sECC memory support-- Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardCompareIntel HD Graphics 3000Intel UHD Graphics 630Max video memoryno data64 GBQuick Sync Video++Clear Videono data+Clear Video HD++Graphics max frequency1.3 GHz1.15 GHzInTru 3D++ Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2760QM and Core i7-8850H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23eDP++DisplayPort++HDMI++DVIno data+SDVO+no dataCRT+no data Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-2760QM and Core i7-8850H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304@30HzMax resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304@60HzMax resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2304@60HzMax resolution over VGAno dataN/A Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-2760QM and Core i7-8850H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12OpenGLno data4.5 Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2760QM and Core i7-8850H.

PCIe version2.03.0PCI Express lanes1616 Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2760QM 2.82 i7-8850H 6.61 +134%

Core i7-8850H outperforms Core i7-2760QM by 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-2760QM 4367 i7-8850H 10224 +134%

Core i7-8850H outperforms Core i7-2760QM by 134% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-2760QM 543 i7-8850H 1320 +143%

Core i7-8850H outperforms Core i7-2760QM by 143% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-2760QM 1682 i7-8850H 4622 +175%

Core i7-8850H outperforms Core i7-2760QM by 175% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-2760QM 4474 i7-8850H 6766 +51.2%

Core i7-8850H outperforms Core i7-2760QM by 51% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-2760QM 16211 i7-8850H 34217 +111%

Core i7-8850H outperforms Core i7-2760QM by 111% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-2760QM 6001 i7-8850H 10516 +75.3%

Core i7-8850H outperforms Core i7-2760QM by 75% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-2760QM 6 i7-8850H 14 +146%

Core i7-8850H outperforms Core i7-2760QM by 146% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-2760QM 3 i7-8850H 7.4 +147%

Core i7-8850H outperforms Core i7-2760QM by 147% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-2760QM 4325 i7-8850H 5922 +36.9%

Core i7-8850H outperforms Core i7-2760QM by 37% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-2760QM 28 i7-8850H 71 +155%

Core i7-8850H outperforms Core i7-2760QM by 155% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-2760QM 120 i7-8850H 216 +79.5%

Core i7-8850H outperforms Core i7-2760QM by 79% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance Pros & cons summary Performance score 2.82 6.61 Integrated graphics card 0.66 3.09 Recency 4 September 2011 2 April 2018 Physical cores 4 6 Threads 8 12 Cost $378 $395 Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm

The Core i7-8850H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2760QM in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2760QM and Core i7-8850H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Core i7-2760QM Core i7-8850H Like Like Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Core i7 2760QM vs Core i3 8121U Core i7 8850H vs Core i7 1165G7 Core i7 2760QM vs Core i7 2820QM Core i5 4430 vs Athlon II X2 270 Core i5 4430 vs Core i5 6350HQ Core i7 3632QM vs Pentium 8505 Core i7 3632QM vs Core i3 4150 Core i5 6500T vs Phenom II X4 B97 Core i7 2720QM vs Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) Core i7 2720QM vs HD Graphics 510 Core i7 2720QM vs Core i3 1220P Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 264 votes

Rate Core i7-2760QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.6 285 votes

Rate Core i7-8850H on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2760QM or Core i7-8850H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

Graphics settings Screen resolution FPS


【本文地址】


今日新闻


推荐新闻


CopyRight 2018-2019 办公设备维修网 版权所有 豫ICP备15022753号-3