[1] Li, G. J., Zhang, M. Y., Pei, W. S., et al. Changes in permafrost extent and active layer thickness in the Northern Hemisphere from 1969 to 2018 [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 804: 150182.[2] Poggio, L., De Sousa, L. M., Batjes, N. H., et al. SoilGrids 2.0: producing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty [J]. Soil, 2021, 7(1): 217-240.[3] Liu, L., Zhao, D. S., Wei, J. Q., et al. Permafrost sensitivity to global warming of 1.5 °C and 2 °C in the Northern Hemisphere [J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2021, 16(3): 034038.[4] Wang, K., Jafarov, E., Overeem, I. Sensitivity evaluation of the Kudryavtsev permafrost model [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 720: 137538.[5] Shiklomanov, N. I., Nelson, F. E. Analytic representation of the active layer thickness field, Kuparuk River Basin, Alaska [J]. Ecological Modelling, 1999, 123(2-3): 105-125.[6] Anisimov, O. A., Shiklomanov, N. I., Nelson, F. E. Global warming and active-layer thickness: results from transient general circulation models [J]. Global and Planetary Change, 1997, 15(3-4): 61-77.[7] Lovato, T., Peano, D. CMCC CMCC-CM2-SR5 model output prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP [DS]. 2020. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.1365.[8] Lovato, T., Peano, D., Butensch?n, M. CMCC CMCC-ESM2 model output prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP [DS]. 2021. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.13168.