高中英语完形填空答题技巧指导举隅 |
您所在的位置：网站首页 › 高中英语完形填空技巧总结大全 › 高中英语完形填空答题技巧指导举隅 |
|
1. Cloze Tests May be Quick, But Are They Dirty? Development and Preliminary Validation of a Cloze Test of Reading Comprehension
[J] .
Journal of psychoeducational assessment
.
2013,第1期
机译：完形填空测试可能很快，但它们肮脏吗？阅读理解的完形填空测试的发展及初步验证 2. Clickers can promote fact retention but impede conceptual understanding: The effect of the interaction between clicker use and pedagogy on learning [J] . Shapiro Amy M., Sims-Knight Judith, ORielly Grant V., Computers & education . 2017,第AUGa期机译：答题器可以促进事实保留，但会妨碍概念性理解：答题器使用与教学法之间的互动对学习的影响 3. Short and Open Answer Question Assessment System based on Concept Maps [J] . Safa Ben Salem, Lilia Cheniti-Belcadhi, Rafik Braham, Journal of information technology research . 2016,第3期机译：基于概念图的简答题答题评估系统 4. Learning a Cost-Effective Annotation Policy for Question Answering [C] . Bernhard Kratzwald, Stefan Feuerriegel, Huan Sun Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing . 2020机译：学习一个经济高效的答题答题政策 5. A validation argument for cloze test item function in second language assessment. [D] . Trace, Jonathan. 2016机译：第二语言评估中的完形填空测试项目功能的验证参数。 6. Function matters: a review of terminological differences in applied and basic clicker training research [O] . Nicole R. Dorey, David J. Cox -1机译：功能很重要：回顾应用答题器和基础答题器训练研究中的术语差异 7. Compreensão da leitura: análise do funcionamento diferencial dos itens de um Teste de Cloze Reading comprehension: differential item functioning analysis of a Cloze Test [O] . Katya Luciane Oliveira, Acácia A. Aparecida Angeli dos Santos, Evely Boruchovitch, 2012机译：阅读理解：完形填空测试中项目的差异功能分析阅读理解：完形填空测试中项目的差异功能分析 8. The Cloze Test as a Procedure for Establishing Objective German Prose Readability Standards. [R] . Strong, B. M. 1978机译：完形填空测试是建立客观德国散文可读性标准的程序。 |
今日新闻 |
推荐新闻 |
| CopyRight 2018-2019 办公设备维修网 版权所有 豫ICP备15022753号-3 |