Molnupiravir Plus Usual Care Versus Usual Care Alone as Early Treatment for Adults with COVID

您所在的位置:网站首页 斗鱼主播巅峰赛怎么参加的 Molnupiravir Plus Usual Care Versus Usual Care Alone as Early Treatment for Adults with COVID

Molnupiravir Plus Usual Care Versus Usual Care Alone as Early Treatment for Adults with COVID

#Molnupiravir Plus Usual Care Versus Usual Care Alone as Early Treatment for Adults with COVID| 来源: 网络整理| 查看: 265

Molnupiravir Plus Usual Care Versus Usual Care Alone as Early Treatment for Adults with COVID-19 at Increased Risk of Adverse Outcomes (PANORAMIC): Preliminary Analysis from the United Kingdom Randomised, Controlled Open-Label, Platform Adaptive Trial

43 Pages Posted: 17 Oct 2022

See all articles by Christopher ButlerChristopher Butler

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Richard Hobbs

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Oghenekome Gbinigie

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Najib M. Rahman

University of Oxford - Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit; University of Oxford - NIHR Biomedical Research Unit Oxford; University of Oxford - Chinese Academy of Medical Science Oxford Institute (COI)

Gail Hayward

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Duncan Richards

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS)

Jienchi Dorward

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences; University of KwaZulu-Natal - Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA)

David Lowe

University College London - UCL Institute of Immunity and Transplantation

Joseph F. Standing

University College London - Department of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity; Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children - Department of Pharmacy

Judith Breuer

University College London - Department of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity

Saye Khoo

University of Liverpool - Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology

Stavros Petrou

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Kerenza Hood

Cardiff University - Centre for Trials Research

Jonathan S. Nguyen-Van-Tam

University of Nottingham - Division of Epidemiology and Public Health

Mahendra Patel

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Benjamin R. Saville

Berry Consultants, LLC; Vanderbilt University - Department of Biostatistics

Joe Marion

Berry Consultants, LLC

Emma Ogburn

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Julie Allen

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Heather Rutter

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Nick Francis

University of Southampton - Primary Care Research Centre

Nicholas Thomas

Windrush Medical Practice; National Institute for Health and Care Research - CRN Thames Valley and South Midlands; Royal College of General Practitioners

Philip Evans

University of Exeter - Faculty of Health and Life Sciences; National Institute for Health and Care Research

Melissa Dobson

University of Oxford - Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit

Tracie-Ann Madden

Cardiff University - Centre for Trials Research

Jane Holmes

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Victoria Harris

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

May Ee Png

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Mark Lown

University of Southampton - Primary Care Research Centre

Oliver van Hecke

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Michelle Detry

Berry Consultants, LLC

Christina Saunders

Berry Consultants, LLC

Mark Fitzgerald

Berry Consultants, LLC

Nicholas Berry

Berry Consultants, LLC

Lazaro Mwandigha

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Ushma Galal

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Bhautesh Jani

University of Glasgow - Institute of Health and Wellbeing

Nigel Hart

Queen's University Belfast - School of Medicine, Dentistry & Biomedical Science

Daniel Butler

Queen's University Belfast - School of Medicine, Dentistry & Biomedical Science

Jeremy Chalk

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Layla Lavallee

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Elizabeth Hadley

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Lucy Cureton

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Magdalena Benysek

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Monique Andersson

NHS Foundation Trust - Oxford University Hospitals

Maria Coates

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Sarah Barrett

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Clare Bateman

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Jennifer Davies

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Ivy Raymundo-Wood

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Andrew Ustianowski

North Manchester General Hospital - Regional Infectious Diseases Unit

Andrew Carson-Stevens

Cardiff University - Centre for Trials Research

Ly-Mee Yu

University of Oxford - Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

Paul Little

University of Southampton - Primary Care and Population Science

Date Written: October 4, 2022

Abstract

Background: The safety, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of molnupiravir, an oral antiviral medication for SARS-CoV-2, in patients in the community who are multiply-vaccinated and at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19, has not been established. We aimed to determine whether molnupiravir added to usual care reduced hospital admissions/deaths among people at higher risk from COVID-19, and here report our preliminary analyses.

Methods: Participants in this UK multicentre, open-label, adaptive, multi-arm, platform, randomised controlled trial were aged ≥50, or ≥18 years with comorbidities, and unwell ≤5 days with confirmed COVID-19 in the community, and were randomised to usual care or usual care plus molnupiravir (800mg twice daily for 5 days). The primary outcome measure was all-cause hospitalisation/death within 28 days, analysed using Bayesian models. The main secondary outcome measure was time to first self-reported recovery. A sub-set of participants in each group were assessed for the virology primary outcome measure of day seven SARS-CoV-2 viral load. Trial registration: ISRCTN30448031

Findings: Between December 8, 2021 and April 27, 2022, 25783 participants were randomised to molnupiravir plus usual care (n=12821) or usual care alone (n=12962). Mean (range) age of participants was 56·6 years (18 to 99), 58·6% were female, and 99% had at least one dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The median duration of symptoms prior to randomisation was two days (IQR 1 – 3), the median number of days from symptom onset to starting to take the medication was three days (IQR 3 – 4), 87% (11109/11997) received their medication within five days of symptom onset, and 95·4% (n=11857) of participants randomised to molnupiravir reported taking molnupiravir for five days. Primary outcome measure data were available in 25000 (97%) participants and included in this analysis. 103/12516 (0·8%) hospitalisations/deaths occurred in the molnupiravir group versus 96/12484 (0·8%) in usual care alone with a posterior probability of superiority of 0·34 (adjusted odds ratio 1·061 (95% Bayesian credible interval [BCI]) 0·80 to 1·40). Estimates were similar for all subgroups. The observed median (IQR) time-to-first-recovery from randomisation was 9 (5–23) days in molnupiravir and 15 (7–not reached) days in usual care. There was an estimated benefit of 4·2 (95% BCI: 3·8 – 4·6) days in time-to-first-recovery (TTR) giving a posterior probability of superiority of >0·999 (estimated median TTR 10·3 [10·2 – 10·6] days vs 14·5 [14·2 – 14·9] days respectively; hazard ratio [95% BCI], 1·36 [1·3–1·4] days), which met the pre-specified superiority threshold. On day 7, SARS-CoV-2 virus was below detection levels in 7/34 (21%) of the molnupiravir group, versus 1/39 (3%) in the usual care group (p=0.039), and mean viral load was lower in the molnupiravir group compared with those receiving usual care [(SD) of log10(viral load) 3·82 (1·40) in the molnupiravir group and 4.93 (1·38) in the usual care group, (P



【本文地址】


今日新闻


推荐新闻


CopyRight 2018-2019 办公设备维修网 版权所有 豫ICP备15022753号-3