根据你的问题描述，我可以非常肯定的说，如果训练方法得到，一个月考取100+是可能的。（主要是你的听力能是很好的）。下面我对提升方法，进行一下阐述。

你的阅读分数正好卡在瓶颈的段位，因此，我们来看看ETS对托福阅读高分段的要求：

信息之间的逻辑关系、文章的组织结构、论据与论证才是托福阅读高分段的关键。前面所说的单词背诵以及长难句的理解，只是基础部分，并不能保证托福阅读考前高分。比如：

这是去年线下考试的一篇文章，我们就单独审视一下前五道题，只有第一题和第四题考的是单词以及句子读懂的基本功，另外三道都是关于句子逻辑关系或者主题结构的，而这也是现在考试命题的趋势特点。我以句子逻辑关系为例，来进行相应的解释

托福阅读中常考的句子逻辑关系如下：

你需要知晓不同逻辑，它的基本特点是什么，对应考点以及解题思路是什么，只有熟练掌握了，你的答题才会清晰。

①Overcrowded neighborhoods may be hazardous to life: Within dense, star clusters, for example, close encounters between neighboring stars could disrupt each other's planetary systems. ②The Sun probably formed in a loose group of stars that has since dispersed. ③Today, stars in Earth's neighborhood are safely separated, by a few light-years on average.

①与②和③构成了明显对比逻辑关系，①讲的是密集的恒星，而②和③讲的是零散或者分散恒星。如果看到对比逻辑，一定会出现取反的考点，①指出密集恒星干扰了其他邻近的星体，对生命形成不利，说明③中地球附近的安全分隔的恒星一定不会互相干扰彼此，有利于生命形成。因此下面这道题，就迎刃而解。

Which of the following can be inferred from the fact that today the stars near the Sun are "safely separated by a few light-years on average"?

A. Life on Earth is not affected by interference from those other stars.

B. Those stars were once much farther apart from one another than they are now.

C. If those stars had been closer to each other, our Sun would have used up its fuel before life could develop on Earth.

D. Most of those stars probably have planets orbiting around them that are capable of supporting life

答案为A选项。

接下来我们来分析一下这道题

Railroads and Commercial Agriculture In Nineteenth-Century United States

A sharp rise in demand for grain abroad also encouraged farmers in the Northeast and Midwest to become more commercially oriented. Wheat, which in 1845 commanded $1.08 a bushel in New York City, fetched $2.46 in 1855; in similar fashion the price of corn nearly doubled. Farmers responded by specializing in cash crops, borrowing to purchase more land, and investing in equipment to increase productivity.

Paragraph 4 supports the idea that the price of wheat more than doubled between 1845 and 1855 because

A. the price of corn nearly doubled during that same period

B. demand for grain increased sharply outside the United States

C. farmers in the Northeast and Midwest began to specialize in cash crops

D. many farmers had borrowed heavily to purchase land and equipment for raising wheat

这是一道好题，这是段落主旨与句子逻辑关系综合在一起的考题。首先该段落的主题句内部是因果关系，即∵国外的谷物需求量上升 ∴农民开始商业化导向。题目对应的句子Wheat, which in 1845 commanded $1.08 a bushel in New York City, fetched $2.46 in 1855; in similar fashion the price of corn nearly doubled.是 farmers in the Northeast and Midwest to become more commercially oriented 的例子，既然是举例逻辑的话，那么例子对象的属性就要服从于主旨，因此1845-1855价格上升是由于国外需求量上升所致，答案为B选项。CD选项属于因果倒置。

写作

独立写作需要从两个维度去提升：

（一）审题

审题非常重要，如果托福写作跑题或者偏题，那你最后的分数一定是20左右波动，而审题的关键之一就是如何拆解题目。比如：

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement：

One can learn a lot about another person from the books and the movies that the person likes.

person这个词属于抽象词汇，那我们就可以拆解为老年人、成年人；再比如movies 我们也可以拆分成科幻、自转、或者生活类。

再比如：

例题一：Parents usually give children suggestions on what class to take in university. For example, some parents would persuade their children to take medical courses even if their children are interested in music courses. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? College students should be completely free to choose whatever courses they like without any influence or suggestions from parents.

这道题其实和之前考过的一道题目极为相似：

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement：

例题二：Students should be encouraged to take courses like science, technology, engineering and math that are likely to lead to job opportunities rather than subjects they might be interested in.

请各位同学一定要审题，2016年这道题主体对象是学生本身，但是2022年的考题加入了父母影响的限制，如果各位同学审题不细致的话，进行角度的完全迁移的话，最终的分数可想而知。（最后的感觉就是，你觉得你写的挺好的，但是最终分数却不尽人意）

例题三： Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

The Internet is as important as other service, such as building roads, so government should make the Internet access to all the citizens at no cost.

请注意，本题中的关键字眼at no cost，很多同学都大谈政府提供免费网络的好处，完全没有提及是否免费，这属于严重的跑题。

（二）中间段落的扩展

说的直白一点儿，那就是，你如何去论证你的观点，而论证观点的核心就是举例子。因此，你一定要把你的观点具体化，具体成一件明确的事件或者明确的群体，这样你的细节论证才能充足。