Many models have been utilized to simulate inertial cavitation for ultrasound therapies such as histotripsy. The models range from the very simple Rayleigh-Plesset model to the complex Gilmore-Akulichev model. The computational time increases with the complexity of the model, so it is important to know when the results from the simpler models are sufficient. In this paper the simulation performance of the widely used Rayleigh-Plesset model, Keller-Miksis model, and Gilmore-Akulichev model both with and without gas diffusion are compared by calculating the bubble radius response and bubble wall velocity as a function the ultrasonic pressure and frequency. The bubble oscillates similarly with the three models within the first collapse for small pressures (