R7 350 vs R7 250 |
您所在的位置：网站首页 › r7250和r7350 › R7 350 vs R7 250 |
|
Radeon R7 350 vs R7 250
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R7 250 and Radeon R7 350, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks. R7 25020132 GB DDR3, GDDR5, 75 Watt 2.77 R7 35020162 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt 5.58 +101% GTX 1650 GTX 1060 6 GB RTX 3060 RTX 4060 RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4080 SUPER RTX 4090 RX 580 RX 5700 Arc A580 RX 7600 XT RX 7800 XT RX 7900 XTXR7 350 outperforms R7 250 by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results. Contents Primary details Cost-effectiveness evaluation Detailed specifications Form factor & compatibility VRAM capacity and type Connectivity and outputs Supported technologies API compatibility In-game performance breakdown Pros & cons summary Vote for your favorite Comparisons with similar GPUs Community ratings Questions & comments R7 250 R7 350 Primary detailsGPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared. Place in performance ranking764570Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.100.82ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GPU code nameOland XTCape VerdeMarket segmentDesktopDesktopDesignreferenceno dataRelease date1 October 2013 (10 years ago)6 July 2016 (8 years ago)Launch price (MSRP)$89 no dataCurrent price$256 (2.9x MSRP)$142 Cost-effectiveness evaluationPerformance to price ratio. The higher, the better. R7 350 has 720% better value for money than R7 250. Detailed specificationsGeneral performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores384512Core clock speedno data800 MHzBoost clock speed1050 MHzno dataNumber of transistors950 million1,500 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm28 nmPower consumption (TDP)75 Watt55 WattTexture fill rate25.2025.60Floating-point performance716.8 gflops819.2 gflops Form factor & compatibilityInformation on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Bus supportPCIe 3.0no dataInterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16Length168 mm168 mmWidth2-slot1-slotSupplementary power connectorsN/ANone VRAM capacity and typeParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5GDDR5Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GBMemory bus width128 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed1150 MHz4500 MHzMemory bandwidth72 GB/s72 GB/sShared memory-no data Connectivity and outputsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortHDMI++DisplayPort support-no data Supported technologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. AppAcceleration+no dataCrossFire1no dataEnduro-no dataFreeSync1no dataHD3D-no dataPowerTune-no dataTrueAudio-no dataZeroCore-no dataDDMA audio+no data API compatibilityList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_1)Shader Model5.15.1OpenGL4.64.6OpenCL1.21.2Vulkanno data1.2.131Mantle-no data Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Full HD19 −84.2% 35−40 +84.2% FPS performance in popular gamesFull HDLow Preset Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 −100% 10−11 +100%Full HDMedium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 −100% 12−14 +100% Battlefield 5 4−5 −100% 8−9 +100% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8 −100% 14−16 +100% Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 −100% 10−11 +100% Far Cry 5 5−6 −100% 10−11 +100% Far Cry New Dawn 7−8 −100% 14−16 +100% Forza Horizon 4 10−12 −90.9% 21−24 +90.9% Hitman 3 6−7 −100% 12−14 +100% Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 −94.4% 35−40 +94.4% Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 −100% 12−14 +100% Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14 −100% 24−27 +100% Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18 −87.5% 30−33 +87.5%Full HDHigh Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 −100% 12−14 +100% Battlefield 5 4−5 −100% 8−9 +100% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8 −100% 14−16 +100% Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 −100% 10−11 +100% Far Cry 5 5−6 −100% 10−11 +100% Far Cry New Dawn 7−8 −100% 14−16 +100% Forza Horizon 4 10−12 −90.9% 21−24 +90.9% Hitman 3 6−7 −100% 12−14 +100% Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 −94.4% 35−40 +94.4% Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 −100% 12−14 +100% Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14 −100% 24−27 +100% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 −100% 14−16 +100% Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18 −87.5% 30−33 +87.5%Full HDUltra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 −100% 12−14 +100% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8 −100% 14−16 +100% Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 −100% 10−11 +100% Far Cry 5 5−6 −100% 10−11 +100% Forza Horizon 4 10−12 −90.9% 21−24 +90.9% Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 −94.4% 35−40 +94.4% Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14 −100% 24−27 +100% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 −100% 14−16 +100% Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18 −87.5% 30−33 +87.5%Full HDEpic Preset Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 −100% 12−14 +100%1440pHigh Preset Battlefield 5 5−6 −100% 10−11 +100% Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 −100% 6−7 +100%1440pUltra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 −100% 4−5 +100% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 −100% 10−11 +100% Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 −100% 2−3 +100% Far Cry 5 4−5 −100% 8−9 +100% Forza Horizon 4 4−5 −100% 8−9 +100% Hitman 3 8−9 −100% 16−18 +100% Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8 −100% 14−16 +100% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 −100% 4−5 +100% Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−11440pEpic Preset Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 −100% 12−14 +100%4KHigh Preset Battlefield 5 1−2 −100% 2−3 +100% Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 −100% 4−5 +100% Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4 −100% 6−7 +100%4KUltra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 −100% 4−5 +100% Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 −100% 2−3 +100% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 −100% 2−3 +100% Far Cry 5 1−2 −100% 2−3 +100% Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4 −100% 6−7 +100% Metro Exodus 5−6 −100% 10−11 +100% Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−14KEpic Preset Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 −100% 8−9 +100%This is how R7 250 and R7 350 compete in popular games: R7 350 is 84% faster in 1080p Pros & cons summary Performance score 2.77 5.58 Recency 1 October 2013 6 July 2016 Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 55 WattR7 350 has a 101.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 36.4% lower power consumption. The Radeon R7 350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 250 in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Vote for your favoriteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. Radeon R7 250 Radeon R7 350 Like Like Comparisons with similar GPUsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Radeon R7 350 vs Radeon HD 7770 Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon HD 4850 Radeon R7 250 vs Quadro P620 Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX Vega 3 Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB Radeon R7 250 vs UHD Graphics 600 Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 Radeon R7 250 vs UHD Graphics 610 Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X Radeon R7 250 vs HD Graphics P4600 Community ratingsHere you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. 3.6 424 votesRate Radeon R7 250 on a scale of 1 to 5: 3.8 457 votesRate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions & commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPS |
| CopyRight 2018-2019 办公设备维修网 版权所有 豫ICP备15022753号-3 |